Didn't they read last week's blog? |
The option most people, unfortunately, choose is the one Randy chose. Not understanding the process, they think, "I want an addition? I'll call a contractor!" Let me be clear on this subject: the vast majority of contractors are very reputable, unlike "Nails 'R Us." (Which, by the way, is a totally fictitious company, before the slander accusations start flying.) The problem is that when a homeowner asks the inevitable "how much is it gonna cost?" question, the poor contractor really doesn't have a clear picture of what is going to be desired. He often gives a price that is far too low, or far too high. Either way, he and the homeowner end up on opposite sides of an argument. Or worse, a lawsuit.
Honey, we can't afford this... |
Once the full plans are completed, they are given to one or more contractors to estimate. The better the drawings, the more accurate the contractor's price will be. Although this process takes time, the homeowner can be assured that he is getting a competitive price and the price is accurate based on exactly what is proposed.
Best buds? |
Randy says his house is famous. I don't know... |
There are a number of other ways the process can work, with names like "Construction Management at-Risk," and "Integrated Project Delivery" (which has nothing to do with the Civil Rights Act.) These methods don't generally apply to residential homeowners, and would make me look like an even bigger geek if I were to try explaining them here.
So which method is right for you? It depends on your preferences. If getting competitive bids (and possibly a cheaper price) appeals to you, go the "Design - Bid - Build" route. If no-hassle one-stop-shopping is your thing, try the "Design-Build" option. Or if you're like Randy, just tear the whole thing down and start over... See you next week!